Pig welfare standards – unpicking the differences

Published on

With the increase in worldwide demand for meat, fast-growing species with efficient feed conversion rates – such as pigs account for a major share of the global livestock sector. In 2017, almost 1 billion pigs were reared worldwide, many in intensive production systems. These have improved the efficiency of rearing pigs and reduced the price of meat, but they have led to some concerns over animal welfare.

Pig welfare standards – unpicking the differences

Welfare standards for pigs in the UK are generally higher than in other countries, with a large number of pigs also reared outdoors. 40% of sows (female pigs) in England are kept outdoors – although their offspring, which are reared for meat, will typically be brought inside for some of their growing period. Most (60%) of these will be housed in straw-based indoor systems. 3 to 4% of meat pigs are reared entirely outdoors either as free-range or organic. Contrasting heavily to the majority of other pig rearing countries where very few, if any pigs are kept outdoors and most pigs are housed indoors on slatted floors.

Welfare issues for pigs

To help unravel the differences between welfare standards we first need to understand what the key welfare issues are for pigs:

Sow stalls

These are pens which are used to individually confine pregnant pigs.

The narrow pens do not allow the pigs to turn around and deprive them of many natural behaviours.

Sow stalls have been banned in the UK since 1999 and their use is limited in the EU, but they are still permitted in many other countries.

Farrowing crates

Sows are typically moved into farrowing crates to give birth. These are similar to sow stalls but have space to the side for the piglets.

They help reduce piglet mortality by preventing accidental crushing by the mother, but they also restrict sow movement and prevent natural behaviours such as nest building.

In the UK and most of the EU sows may be kept in farrowing crates for up to 5 weeks. Unrestricted use is permitted in many other countries.

Tail docking

This is used to prevent tail biting which is an abnormal behaviour in pigs triggered by stress.

In the UK and EU tail docking is permitted where there is evidence of tail-biting and it is commonly performed - 70% of UK pigs are docked compared to virtually all pigs in Denmark, Holland, Germany and Spain. In the US, Canada and Brazil tail docking is legally permitted without restriction.

Surgical castration

This is performed to prevent boar taint (an unpleasant taste in pork).

It is permitted in the EU but must be performed by a trained person and pain killers must be given. In the UK it is not permitted under welfare labelling schemes (e.g. Red Tractor or RSPCA assured) so just 2% of male pigs are castrated. This compares with Sweden (94%), Denmark (95%), Netherlands (20%), Germany (80%) and Spain (20%). In the US, Canada and Brazil timing and the use of pain killers is not set out in legislation although Canada has a code of practice covering these points.


Differences in pig welfare regulations between countries

The table below outlines the differences in pig welfare legislation between the UK and other major pork-producing areas:







Tail docking permitted



Surgical castration permitted

Not permitted under welfare labelling schemes

Sow stalls used


Restricted use

Banned in 9 states

No farrowing crates

Restricted use

Restricted use

Antibiotics used for growth promotion



Ractopamine used (a drug which promotes leanness)



Source: Animal Welfare Matrix, National Pig Association


Differences between welfare labelling schemes

A number of welfare labelling schemes in the UK set voluntary higher welfare standards that exceed UK legislation requirements. The table below outlines the main differences in animal welfare standards between the UK labelling schemes.

Red Tractor

Standards are very close to UK legal requirements and cover both indoor and outdoor rearing systems. Surgical castration is not permitted. Farms are regularly inspected for compliance with the standards.

Outdoor bred

Sows are kept in straw bedded arks with access to outdoor paddocks for their entire productive lives. Farrowing crates are not permitted, instead the sows give birth to their litters outdoors in individual straw-bedded shelters. The piglets are reared outdoors for four weeks and they are then moved indoors for the rest of the growing period.  The indoor system may be straw based (if RSPCA assured) or otherwise they may be housed on slatted or concrete floors with minimal enrichment for the pigs.

RSPCA assured

The scheme covers indoor and outdoor rearing systems. Pigs that are permanently housed indoors are given more space than minimum legal requirements and must be provided with straw for rooting and foraging. Farrowing crates are not permitted and tail docking is only permitted in exceptional cases.


Outdoor reared

Similar to outdoor bred, but the piglets are kept outdoors for longer (10 weeks) before being moved into a straw based system for fattening.


pigs in field

Free range

Both sows and piglets are kept outdoors for all their lives. Farrowing crates are not permitted and tail docking is typically not needed.

pigs outside


Both sows and piglets are kept outdoors for all their lives and are fed organic non-GM feed. Farrowing crates are not permitted and tail docking is prohibited. Piglets are weaned at 40 days as opposed to 21 days which is the non-organic legal minimum.


Although there are differences in welfare standards between the labels there are advantages and disadvantages to all these systems. For example, in free-range systems it can be challenging keeping the pigs warm through winter and the pigs rooting with their snouts can cause soil erosion. Equally, it can be difficult satisfying the behavioural needs of pigs to root in non-straw based indoor systems. There are also differences in production costs between the systems. It costs more raise an organic pig, than a free range pig, which is more expensive to rear than an indoor housed pig. This has understandable impact on the price consumers pay for the meat.

ADAS supports businesses in overcoming the challenges they face as they strive to make continuous improvement in farm animal health and welfare. We deliver a wide range of consultancy, research and training in relation to the health and welfare of all major livestock species (including cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry), working to improve stock performance, ensure consumer needs are met and enhance industry reputation, both within the UK and globally.

Find out more

For more information on ADAS services, please visit our Animal Health and Welfare Services page.

Number of views (1989)

Share this article:

RSK logo

ADAS is part of the RSK Group. RSK is the UK’s largest privately-owned multi-disciplinary environmental consultancy and one of the fastest-growing companies of its kind in Europe. With operations in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, our solutions-led consultancy services help organisations conduct business in a compliant, and environmentally-responsible manner

Spring Lodge, 172 Chester Road,
Helsby, WA6 0AR
+44 (0)1928 726006

ADAS logo

ADAS is the UK’s largest independent provider of agricultural and environmental consultancy, rural development services and policy advice. We have a unique combination of practical experience, underpinned by science-based data, which allows us to meet the needs of our clients. Our great strength is our breadth and depth of expertise spanning the entire environmental sector.

Spring Lodge, 172 Chester Road,
Helsby, WA6 0AR
+44 (0)333 0142950

Copyright 2018 RSK ADAS Ltd.
ADAS is a trading name of RSK ADAS Ltd. Registered in England No. 10486936

| Terms Of Use | Privacy Copyright 2020 RSK ADAS Ltd.